Boots WebMD Partners in Health
Return To Boots

Fitness health centre

Which has more health benefits, high or low intensity exercise?

A small study in healthy people suggests short that bursts of physical exercise are not enough to compensate for the negative effects of being inactive for long periods during the rest of the day.

BMJ Group News

What do we know already?

womb cancer and exercise_woman riding bicycle

General health guidance advises people to be active, by taking part in moderate exercise such as riding a bike, running, or swimming, for at least 30 minutes, five times a week. But many people struggle to exercise for this amount of time, and have jobs and lifestyles that involve long, unavoidable periods of sitting.

Recent studies have suggested that spending long periods every day sitting down is linked to an increased risk of health problems, such as obesity and diabetes.

Researchers wanted to test a theory that these negative health effects can be avoided if people are active for short periods - say, an hour a day.

They divided 18 healthy young adults into three groups, each of which followed an exercise programme for four separate days. One group sat down for 14 hours a day. A second group sat down for 13 hours a day and exercised by cycling vigorously for one hour.

The third group exercised for six hours a day - four hours of walking at a leisurely pace and two hours of standing - and sat down for eight hours a day. Everyone had a blood test on the morning of each day, so researchers could test the participants’ blood sugar, cholesterol levels, and blood lipids, to look for signs of improved health.

What does the new study say?

People in the group who exercised vigorously for one hour a day didn’t show any improvement in the level of lipids or insulin in their blood, or how sensitive they were to the effects of insulin. Low insulin sensitivity can lead to a variety of health problems and can be an early sign of diabetes.

There was some evidence that the group who exercised for longer, but at lower intensity, had healthier levels of insulin and blood lipids.

How reliable is the research?

This study only looked at 18 people and results from such small studies can be affected by random chance. The signs of ill health the researchers tested for - levels of lipids and hormones in the blood - don’t necessarily reflect people’s actual health. The exercise programmes followed by the people in the study aren’t really representative of how people exercise in their daily lives, and we can’t be sure that there weren’t other things that influenced how ‘healthy’ people were on the days that they took part.

What does this mean for me?

This study shows that it’s better to be active as much as possible, as often as possible, to try and maintain good health. It suggests that - if you are very inactive most of the time - there aren’t any easy shortcuts to exercise.

Published on February 17, 2013

Popular Slideshows & Tools on Boots WebMD

woman looking at pregnancy test
Early pregnancy symptoms
donut on plate
The truth about sugar addiction
smiling african american woman
Best kept secrets for beautiful hair
couple watching sunset
How much do you know?
nappy being changed
How to change your baby's nappy
woman using moisturizer
Causes and home solutions
assorted spices
Pump up the flavour with spices
bag of crisps
Food cravings that wreck your diet
woman with cucumbers on eyes
How to banish dark circles and bags
probiotic shakes
Help digestion
polka dot dress on hangar
Lose weight without dieting